<<< Coding for the future >>>
| AT&T calls Googles bluff |
|
|
|
| Saturday, 26 September 2009 11:28 |
|
"By openly flaunting the call-blocking prohibition that applies to its competitors, Google is acting in a manner inconsistent with the spirit, if not the letter, of the FCC's fourth principle contained in its Internet Policy Statement,"
Google has fired back in a blog post by Richard Whitt - Google's lobbyist. He acknowledged that Google does block calls but said the reason was certain local telephone carriers in rural areas charge AT&T and other long-distance companies especially high rates to connect calls to their networks.
But so what? If AT&T has to pay these charges to connect calls, why not Google? Why does Google get to pick and choose which calls to connect, but the other telecommunications companies cannot? Is Google special? AT&T stated that in 2007, these higher charges had cost it in the region of $250 million - a cost it had no choice but to pay given that its customers are often on flat tariffs i.e phone contracts that pay a flat monthly fee no matter where the calls are place.
Google meanwhile reckons it is above the Internet Principles and should be able to pick and choose who it's customers can call. An absurd position and a flagrant breach of the principles.
Either Google, who has been fully supportive of the Internet Principle's obey them or they are engaged in duplicity and deception. There are no two ways about this.
|
| Last Updated on Saturday, 26 September 2009 11:46 |